To the casual observer of news reports about the Keystone
pipeline proposal it would seem the issue is about building a pipeline from
Canada to the Gulf Coast through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma,
and Texas. The interconnected pieces associated with the pipeline make this issue complex. The issues include the environment, jobs, US-china relations,
lower dependence on Middle Eastern oil, and the infringement of native America
property rights.
Environmentally, President Obama’s
ordering of a revised route was about re-routing the pipeline around the
Sandyhills in Nebraska. Sandyhills is a region of mixed-grass prairie on
grass-stabilized sand dunes in north-central Nebraska with wildlife. The pipelines possible impact on this natural
preserve would be unthinkable; however, the revision of the pipeline route
delays a decision, which could create thousands of jobs. Similarly, the delay
provides China an opportunity to lobby Canada for the more commercial equity in
the Keystone pipeline productions. This
comes at a time when US-China relations are competitive across the economic and
military domains. As the United States has concerns about its competitiveness
in the global market, the Keystone pipeline issue is crucial to reducing the
United States dependency on Middle Eastern oil, especially with its continued reduction
of itsmilitary presence in the region and the rise of other parties influence in the
region. Finally, Native American leaders claim the pipeline would contaminate
the Missouri river water pipeline bringing the issue full circle to the
environmental impacts.
This issue is more complex than it seems.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are highly encouraged.